Why a history beats a snapshot
One example, from a real household record.
A 100g bar of dark chocolate, bought 29 times from the same store over 17 months. A discount was printed on the line 24 of those times.
Only 11 of those 29 receipts printed a quantity. The other 18 didn’t, so the price per unit on them can’t be proven, and they’re left out of what follows. That’s the rule this product runs on, applied to our own example: a figure we can’t derive from the receipt is a figure we don’t publish.
Those 11 purchases span nine months. Ten of them carried a discount.
The discounted price went from $3.34 to $4.09. Up 22.5%. The reference price went from $4.49 to $5.49. Up 22.3%.
They moved together. The discount held its proportion the whole way, so every receipt showed a saving of roughly the same size while the amount leaving the account climbed by a fifth.
That’s what a snapshot can’t show you. Any one of those receipts was accurate and told you that you’d saved money. All of them were right. None of them could tell you that the saving was tracking a rising price rather than protecting you from it — because a discount is a comparison against one week’s reference price, and a direction only exists across many purchases of the same item.
That’s what a price history is, and it’s the only place this is visible.